Nonprofit Audit vs Review vs Compilation Cost Comparison

Your general contractor just submitted another draw request for $340,000. The invoice shows 60% completion on structural steel, but your site superintendent says those beams won’t arrive for another two weeks. Sound familiar? Misaligned construction draws and progress payments create more cash flow headaches and project disputes than almost any other financial issue in construction.

How Construction Draws Actually Work

Progress payments keep money flowing through a project as work gets completed. The contractor completes a phase of work, submits documentation showing what’s done and requests payment for that portion. Simple in theory, messy in practice.

Most construction loans tie funding to a percentage of completion, verified by the lender’s inspector or third-party reviewer. But contractors often need payment before the lender releases funds. That timing gap is where projects get stuck and relationships get strained.

The American Institute of Architects G702 and G703 forms remain the industry standard for documenting these requests. They break down each line item, show stored materials, track retainage and create a paper trail that keeps everyone honest. But filling out forms correctly is just table stakes. The real skill is matching payment schedules to actual project cash needs without taking on unnecessary risk. For a deeper look at how these forms connect to revenue recognition and tax compliance, JMCO’s guide to AIA billing covers the mechanics in detail.

Why Front-Loaded Schedules and Stored Materials Deserve Extra Scrutiny

Most project owners hold back 5% to 10% retainage until substantial completion. That’s insurance against incomplete work or defects. But contractors push back because they’re financing the project with their own working capital.

Smart project owners create payment schedules that match actual construction milestones, not arbitrary calendar dates. Concrete footings inspected and approved? Release that draw. Invoices for materials sitting in a warehouse somewhere? That deserves a closer look.

Too many owners pay for “stored materials” that somehow never make it to the job site. Before paying early for materials, get lien waivers, verify the materials exist and make sure the contract provides a security interest in those materials. Otherwise that payment is an interest-free loan with no collateral behind it.

The same scrutiny applies to front-loaded payment schedules. When a contractor wants 40% upfront for mobilization and permits, the owner needs to understand exactly what that money covers. Real costs or cash flow management? There’s a difference, and it matters.

Construction Draw Red Flags That Signal Trouble

Watch for draw requests that consistently run ahead of visible progress. The accounting team should compare each request against the schedule of values approved at contract signing. Variances happen, but when they’re always in the contractor’s favor, that’s a pattern worth investigating.

Incomplete lien waivers represent another common issue. Before releasing any progress payment, the owner needs unconditional lien waivers from the contractor for the previous payment period and conditional waivers for the current one. Miss this step and the risk is paying twice: once to the contractor and again to the subcontractor who didn’t get paid.

Change orders complicate everything. They shift the budget, alter the schedule of values and create opportunities for creative billing. Every change order needs a price, a paper trail and a clear understanding of how it affects future draw requests. Poor change order management is one of the most common causes of construction project disputes, and the financial exposure escalates quickly when documentation falls behind.

Build Payment Controls Into the Contract

The accounting system needs to track more than just payments out and retainage held. Job costing that compares budgeted costs to actual costs to committed costs provides the three-way view that shows where a project really stands, not just where the payment applications say it stands.

Require the contractor to provide detailed backup with every payment application. That means subcontractor invoices, material receipts, certified payroll (if it’s a public project) and progress photos. Yes, it’s more paperwork. It’s also how to avoid paying $200,000 for work that’s only 40% complete.

Regular site visits by someone who knows construction, not just the accountant, keep everyone honest. When the boots-on-the-ground assessment matches the payment application, the project is in good shape. When they don’t match, the problem has been caught before it becomes expensive.

The best approach is building payment controls into the contract from day one. Specify what documentation is required, how completion will be verified and what happens if a draw request doesn’t meet the stated standards. Clear expectations prevent most disputes before they start.

Protect Cash Flow by Getting Draw Processes Right

Getting construction draws and progress payments right protects cash, keeps projects moving and maintains good relationships with quality contractors. If your firm is looking to strengthen construction accounting controls or needs help setting up a better payment process, our team brings deep construction industry experience to these exact challenges. Let’s talk.

All content provided in this article is for informational purposes only. Matters discussed in this article are subject to change. For up-to-date information on this subject please contact a James Moore professional. James Moore will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within these pages or any information accessed through this site.