Revenue Sharing in College Athletics: A New Era of Accountability

The advent of revenue sharing in college athletics, spurred by the House settlement, represents a seismic shift in collegiate sports. While the notion of student-athletes receiving direct payments is exciting for players and fans, it ushers in new challenges for athletic departments, coaches and institutional leadership.

With these changes come heightened responsibilities and expectations that redefine the operational and cultural dynamics of college sports.

Why Accountability Is Essential

In recent years, athletic departments could distance themselves from the financial aspects of player payments. External collectives managed these transactions, allowing departments to operate with minimal involvement in the NIL (name, image and likeness) ecosystem.

But with revenue sharing in collegiate athletics and payments moving in house, the stakes are higher — and the accountability lies squarely on the shoulders of athletic departments.

As one athletic director remarked, “More money means greater responsibility—and higher expectations.” The ability to secure funding now comes with increased scrutiny, not only from donors and fans but also from internal stakeholders such as campus leadership and the coaching staff.

The Impact on Coaches

One group that faces amplified expectations is head coaches. Historically, donors or collectives absorbed the pressure associated with athlete compensation. Now, athletic departments are reallocating budgets and resources to accommodate revenue sharing. This is creating a direct link between financial decisions and performance outcomes.

The transition to revenue sharing in collegiate athletics is more than merely a financial adjustment. It’s a cultural shift that requires athletic departments to foster an environment in which all stakeholders—administrators, coaches, and players—clearly understand their roles and responsibilities in this evolving model. This transformation involves challenging yet essential conversations, including redefining expectations for coaching performance and budgetary management.

The recent restructuring of Mike Gundy’s contract at Oklahoma State exemplifies this trend, emphasizing the alignment of compensation with performance and program outcomes. Similarly, North Carolina’s substantial investment in its new football coaching staff (led by the high-profile hire of Bill Belichick) and its aggressive allocation of funds toward NIL deals illustrate how schools are recalibrating their budgets to drive competitive success.

These moves reflect the financial realities of modern college athletics. Institutions are increasingly focused on making sure significant spending translates into measurable results. There’s also a broader shift toward dynamic and accountable leadership models.

As departments assume greater financial control, stakeholders may demand higher levels of transparency and performance in return for their contributions. This new dynamic underscores the importance of building trust and aligning financial strategies with institutional goals.

Why It Matters

The House settlement and its resulting revenue sharing model are more than just financial innovations. They represent a paradigm shift in how college athletics operates. For institutions to thrive in this era, accountability must be embedded in every level of the organization. By fostering clear expectations, reallocating resources strategically and embracing a performance-driven culture, athletic departments can weather this transition successfully.

This is a pivotal moment for college sports—one that holds the potential to redefine relationships between players, coaches and administrators. Challenges abound when it comes to revenue sharing in collegiate athletics. But so do opportunities for institutions to emerge stronger, more transparent and better positioned to meet the demands of modern collegiate athletics.

In this new era of accountability, partnering with James Moore & Co. can provide athletic departments with the financial guidance and strategic insights they need to face complex challenges. Our experienced collegiate athletics services team helps institutions develop transparent budgeting processes, optimize resource allocation and ensure compliance with revenue-sharing models—empowering them to thrive in this evolving industry.

All content provided in this article is for informational purposes only. Matters discussed in this article are subject to change. For up-to-date information on this subject please contact a James Moore professional. James Moore will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within these pages or any information accessed through this site.