Georgia Senate Passes Bill Making Property Tax Increase Cap Mandatory for Homeowners

The Georgia State Senate passed Senate Bill 382 on Tuesday, voting 31 to 19 to prevent local governments and school districts from opting out of a statewide homestead tax exemption that caps annual property tax increases on primary residences. The bill now moves to the House for review and represents the latest effort by state Republicans to address rising property costs across Georgia.

What the Statewide Homestead Tax Exemption Does

In November 2024, Georgia voters approved a statewide homestead tax exemption under House Bill 581. The measure caps property tax increases on primary residences by freezing homestead values based on a yearly assessment of the consumer price index. This means homestead values would increase by the same percentage as inflation, regardless of location within the state.

However, the original bill included an opt-out clause that allowed local governments and school districts to decline participation. According to a report by the Georgia State University Center for State and Local Finance, around two-thirds of school systems, a third of counties, and a quarter of cities opted out. This includes several school systems and counties in metro Atlanta, including the City of Atlanta itself.

Senator Carden Summers, a Republican from Cordele, said during Tuesday’s debate that the Senate should never have included the opt-out clause. “We should’ve stood our ground here in the Senate, sent it back to the House and not have an opt-out clause in it,” Summers said, as reported by WABE.

The new Senate Bill 382 would eliminate the opt-out option, making the statewide homestead exemption mandatory for all local governments and school districts.

Revenue Replacement Through Local Sales Taxes

To address revenue losses from the property tax cap, HB 581 allows counties to levy a Floating Local Option Sales Tax (FLOST), a 1% sales tax that runs for five years and requires voter approval. According to the Georgia Municipal Association, voters approved 32 of the 36 FLOST referendums on the November 2025 ballot.

Senate Bill 382 would also ensure that FLOST funds are returned to taxpayers sooner. Under the bill, penny sales tax money collected through June 30 of a tax year would be returned to taxpayers that same year.

For commercial property owners and real estate investors in Georgia, these changes do not directly affect non-homestead properties. However, the shift in how local governments fund operations could have indirect effects on services, infrastructure, and development priorities, thereby impacting commercial real estate values and operating costs.

James Moore’s real estate advisory team works with property owners and investors to assess tax obligations, plan for cash flow, and structure investments that account for changing local tax policies.

Supporters Say Bill Protects Homeowners from Rising Costs

Senator Chuck Hufstetler, a Republican from Rome who introduced the bill, argued that the opt-out measure “guts the protection for the homeowner.” He said homeowners have reported they can no longer afford massive increases in property taxes. “Affordability is a word you’ve heard a lot of this year,” Hufstetler said, according to WABE. “And yet with a billion sitting in the bank, we have local governments, mostly school districts, saying they will not be able to pay their bills unless they continue these double digit increases.”

Senator Ed Setzler, a Republican from Acworth, said the bill has a “very, very small impact on governments’ ability to tax” but provides “significant impact for homeowner predictability and certainty to be able to stay in their homes,” as reported by WABE.

The National Association of Realtors reported that property tax increases have been a major concern for homeowners nationwide, with some markets seeing double-digit assessment increases in recent years driven by rising home values.

Opponents Raise Concerns About Local Flexibility and Services

Democratic lawmakers raised concerns about the bill during Tuesday’s debate. Senate Minority Leader Harold Jones II said SB 382 erases the bipartisan compromise achieved in the original exemption. He noted that the original bill required a two-thirds majority to send a constitutional amendment to voters, which forced Democrats and Republicans to work together.

Senator Elena Parent, a Democrat from Atlanta, said the mandatory statewide exemption reduces flexibility for school districts and counties that have different needs. “A one size fits all is potentially not a great policy for a state with 159 counties that are so disparate in their population, in their median income, whether they’re even urban or rural,” Parent said, according to WABE.

Senator Nan Orrock, who also represents a portion of Atlanta, referenced Atlanta Public Schools’ plan to consolidate and close schools as part of the APS Forward 2040 initiative, which aims to address budget shortfalls. “How much do we want to hobble public education?” Orrock asked, as reported by WABE.

James Moore provides tax planning and consulting services to help real estate clients understand how changes in local tax policy may affect property operations, valuations, and investment decisions.

What This Means for Georgia’s Real Estate Market

While Senate Bill 382 focuses on homestead properties, its passage could have broader implications for Georgia’s commercial real estate sector. If local governments face revenue constraints due to capped homestead property taxes, they may increase reliance on taxes and fees from non-homestead properties, including commercial buildings, investment properties, and rental housing.

Property owners should monitor how counties and municipalities adjust their revenue strategies in response to the mandatory cap. Changes could include higher assessments on commercial properties, increased permitting fees, or new local taxes that affect operating costs.

For developers and investors evaluating projects in Georgia, understanding how local governments plan to manage budget pressures will be important to assessing long-term costs and risks. Markets with strong sales tax bases or diverse revenue sources may be better positioned to absorb the impact of property tax caps than areas that rely heavily on property taxes for funding.

Florida’s property laws and regulations are complex—our team helps you stay compliant while protecting your investments.

Get in touch.

All content provided in this article is for informational purposes only. Matters discussed in this article are subject to change. For up-to-date information on this subject please contact a James Moore professional. James Moore will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within these pages or any information accessed through this site.