How to Account for Indirect Manufacturing Costs Without Losing Profit Visibility

You’d think a fully booked production line would be a great thing, right? But for one mid-sized manufacturer we worked with, all that activity was hiding a hard truth. Their gross margin was slowly eroding because their indirect costs were quietly outpacing their pricing strategy. No one had noticed until it showed up in the year-end numbers.

That’s the thing about indirect manufacturing costs. When you’re laser-focused on production and delivery, it’s easy to let certain expenses float into general buckets without digging deeper. But those costs can quickly get out of hand and distort your product pricing, financial reports, and even your ability to grow.

Here’s how to identify, categorize and account for these costs accurately.

 

 

What are indirect manufacturing costs?

Indirect manufacturing costs are the expenses required to operate your production facility that aren’t directly tied to a specific product. You can’t trace them to a single unit, but they have a measurable impact on your bottom line.

Typical examples include:

• Factory utilities like electricity, water and gas
• Equipment maintenance and repairs
• Salaries for factory supervisors and floor managers
• Depreciation on production equipment and buildings
• Indirect materials such as lubricants, safety gear and cleaning supplies

While direct costs like raw materials and assembly labor are simple to track, indirect costs are often overlooked or lumped into general overhead. That’s where problems start. Many manufacturers still rely on outdated spreadsheets or overly broad categories, making it easy to misallocate costs or lose visibility into where the money’s really going.

There are also specific rules for manufacturers on how to classify and allocate indirect costs. These guidelines affect how you value inventory and report income, which means getting it wrong could result in compliance risks.

Bottom line: Clarity matters. Accurately identifying and allocating indirect manufacturing costs helps you protect profit margins, stay compliant and make smarter decisions about pricing and production.

Why accurate cost allocation matters to manufacturers

When indirect costs are misclassified or misallocated, your margins start to lie. That’s not a dramatic statement. It’s what happens when hidden expenses quietly build up in the background of your operations. You may think a product line is performing well, only to find it’s barely breaking even once overhead is accounted for properly.

Manufacturing businesses deal with complex cost structures. In addition to materials and labor, factory utilities, depreciation, equipment maintenance, quality control and supervision all play a role in delivering a finished product. If those costs aren’t accurately attributed, you’re flying blind.

Let’s say you assign overhead evenly across all product lines without considering actual machine hours or labor intensity. The result? Lower-margin products end up shouldering more cost than they generate, while higher-margin lines may appear more profitable than they are. That leads to poor pricing decisions, missed opportunities for cost savings and inaccurate forecasting.

One example we see time and again is the blanket allocation of indirect costs using only labor hours. For many manufacturers, machine time is a much more accurate driver of overhead. If your machines are running up electricity, maintenance and depreciation, allocating costs by labor hours simply won’t reflect true usage.

These missteps have real consequences. Mispriced products, misleading financials, and inefficient operations can hold you back from scaling or attracting investors. Over time, it creates friction in nearly every department, from sales to supply chain to finance.

Accounting for indirect manufacturing costs gives you the visibility and control to run a smarter, more profitable operation.

Common methods to allocate indirect costs

To get your cost allocations right, you need a method that fits your operation and tells the truth about how your business runs. There are several widely accepted ways to allocate indirect manufacturing costs, and choosing the wrong one can skew your numbers in a big way.

The two most common approaches are traditional costing and activity-based costing (ABC).

Traditional costing

This method uses a single cost driver to allocate overhead. It’s simple and works well in operations where indirect costs follow a predictable pattern. Most companies use direct labor hours, direct labor costs or machine hours as the basis for spreading overhead.

For example, if one product takes twice as many machine hours as another, it will absorb twice the overhead. This approach is efficient and easy to apply, but it can mislead in more complex operations with diverse product lines.

Activity-based costing (ABC)

ABC recognizes that not all overhead costs behave the same way and allocates them based on actual activities that drive cost. For example, setups, inspections and material handling might each have separate cost pools and cost drivers.

This method is especially useful in environments with varied products, frequent changeovers or custom manufacturing. It gives a more precise picture of where your money is going, which helps you spot inefficiencies and make better pricing decisions.

The method you choose depends on your business model, product variety and the size of your overhead. If your product lines are similar and overhead is small, traditional costing may be enough. But if you’re dealing with complex processes, ABC can provide a much clearer view.

The Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) from NIST provides tools and case studies that can help manufacturers apply these costing methods to improve operational decisions. Their real-world examples show how choosing the right approach can have a direct impact on profit margins.

 

 

Tools and systems that support better indirect cost tracking

If you can’t see where your money is going, you can’t make smart decisions about how to manage it. That’s where modern tools and systems come in.

An Excel spreadsheet worked fine when your operation was smaller. But once you’re managing multiple production lines, employees and overhead pools, it’s time to upgrade your toolkit.

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are the gold standard. These platforms integrate your production, inventory, HR and financials so everything talks to each other. A well-implemented ERP can automate the tracking of indirect costs, tie them to production data and provide accurate cost-per-unit insights in real time.

Platforms like NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, and SAP Business One offer built-in cost accounting modules tailored for manufacturers. They allow you to set up custom overhead pools, use multiple allocation drivers, and generate detailed cost reports at the product or job level.

For smaller manufacturers or those transitioning to more robust systems, tools like QuickBooks Enterprise for Manufacturing and Wholesale or Fishbowl Manufacturing can also help track indirect costs more effectively (though with some limitations in customization).

Technology alone isn’t enough, though. It takes a strategy to get results. This includes:

• Defining indirect cost categories clearly
• Choosing the right cost drivers
• Setting up workflows for consistent data entry
• Training your team on how to interpret the output

When indirect costs are tracked and categorized properly, the payoff is better pricing, stronger forecasting and the ability to scale confidently.

Real-world pitfalls manufacturers often miss

Even with the best tools and good intentions, manufacturers still fall into a few common traps when it comes to indirect costs.

One of the biggest mistakes is assuming that indirect costs are fixed. In reality, many of them are semi-variable. For example, your factory utility bill may go up during peak production seasons. If you’re allocating that cost evenly throughout the year, you’re misrepresenting the true cost of making each product during busy periods.

Another common oversight is relying too heavily on square footage or headcount as a cost driver. While these are easy to apply, they often don’t reflect real resource consumption. Two product lines may occupy the same floor space, but if one requires constant quality checks and machine calibration, its share of indirect costs should be higher. Using an overly simple allocation method can hide this.

Some manufacturers forget to include indirect labor in their overhead pool. This includes roles like janitorial staff, plant managers, forklift operators and warehouse supervisors. These team members don’t work on the line, but their efforts support production. Leaving them out skews labor cost reporting and leads to an incomplete picture of production costs.

Depreciation is another silent issue. Many companies either ignore it altogether or misallocate it across departments. Yet it often represents a sizable portion of indirect costs, especially for manufacturers with heavy equipment or long asset lives. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) provides guidance on how to treat depreciation and asset use in cost accounting, and their standards are key to aligning with U.S. GAAP.

Beyond accounting, there’s a cultural element to consider. When teams don’t understand how overhead works or why it matters, they treat it as a finance issue rather than an operational one. That disconnect can cause tension when departments are asked to cut costs or justify resource usage.

This is where having accurate, transparent data is powerful. It takes the emotion out of tough conversations and helps every department see how their work connects to cost and profit.

How to avoid indirect cost surprises during growth

Growing manufacturers often focus their energy on scaling production, entering new markets or launching new product lines. But as operations expand, so does complexity. Without a clear view of indirect costs, growth can expose problems that were hidden when things were smaller and simpler.

One of the most common examples is a shift in production mix. When a business adds custom or low-volume products to its line, those items typically consume more resources per unit. Setups take longer, quality assurance needs increase and more skilled supervision may be required. If you continue allocating overhead based on high-volume assumptions, your reporting won’t reflect the true cost of these lower-run jobs.

Facility expansions are another area where surprises pop up. New square footage often means more utilities, insurance, maintenance and depreciation. If those costs are simply folded into the same overhead pool and divided by the same old labor hours, your product cost models will lose accuracy.

The Small Business Administration (SBA) outlines the importance of adjusting your cost structure during periods of growth. They advise reviewing indirect cost allocations any time you add capacity, change processes or experience significant changes in order volume.

Manufacturers expanding across multiple sites face an even more complicated challenge. Costs vary significantly between locations due to differences in rent, labor rates and energy costs. Pooling all overhead together across facilities can misrepresent profitability at the plant level. In these cases, a plant-by-plant allocation model may be necessary to get meaningful insight.

Growth is not the time to relax your cost controls. If anything, it is the time to double down. You need systems that scale with you, processes that adjust as you grow and people who understand how to keep overhead aligned with the real story of your operation.

How smart indirect cost accounting protects your margins

Knowing your indirect manufacturing costs helps you protect your margins, guide your pricing strategy and make confident decisions as your business grows. When these costs are tracked and allocated correctly, you gain an edge that reaches far beyond the accounting department.

At James Moore, we help manufacturing businesses bring clarity to their cost structure and confidence to their operations. If you’re ready to make your financials a source of strength, not stress, we’re here to help.

Contact a James Moore professional to talk through your indirect cost strategy and see how we can support your long-term goals.

 

 

All content provided in this article is for informational purposes only. Matters discussed in this article are subject to change. For up-to-date information on this subject please contact a James Moore professional. James Moore will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within these pages or any information accessed through this site.