Direct Investment vs. Fund Participation: What Works Best for Family Offices in Real Estate?

Real estate now accounts for 39% of family office portfolio allocations worldwide. That figure comes from PwC’s 2025 Global Family Office Deals Study, which tracked more than 20,000 family offices globally. The shift toward real estate reflects a growing preference for stable investments over riskier alternatives. But for family offices considering this asset class, the question remains: should you buy properties directly or invest through professionally managed funds?

Understanding the Core Differences

Direct investment means your family office acquires properties outright. You control the asset, make decisions about management and improvements, and determine when to sell. Fund participation means committing capital to a real estate fund managed by professionals who source deals, handle operations and distribute returns to investors.

Each approach serves different purposes. The right choice depends on your family office’s size, staff expertise, risk tolerance and long-term goals. Neither option is universally better. What matters is alignment between your investment approach and your family’s capabilities.

The Appeal of Direct Real Estate Ownership

Family offices that invest directly in real estate gain significant control over their holdings. You select properties based on your own criteria, negotiate purchase terms and implement value-add strategies that match your expertise. If your family built wealth through construction, development or property management, direct ownership allows you to apply that knowledge to generate returns.

Fee savings also factor into the equation. Traditional fund structures charge annual management fees plus a percentage of profits above certain thresholds. Over decades of investing, those fees compound into substantial amounts. Direct investors retain more of their earnings.

The Goldman Sachs 2025 Family Office Investment Insights Report found that 44% of family offices invest primarily directly in private real estate. These families are leveraging their operational expertise rather than outsourcing to fund managers.

However, direct investing demands internal resources. You need staff with acquisition experience, property management capabilities and accounting infrastructure to track performance across holdings. Larger family offices can justify building these teams. Smaller offices may find the overhead costs difficult to absorb.

Why Fund Participation Still Makes Sense

Funds offer access to professional management and diversification that would be expensive for individual family offices to replicate. Experienced fund managers maintain relationships with brokers, lenders and operators that generate deal flow. They employ analysts who evaluate hundreds of potential acquisitions before selecting the best opportunities.

Diversification represents a key advantage. A single fund may hold properties across multiple markets and asset types, reducing the impact of any one investment underperforming. For family offices seeking exposure to industrial logistics, data centers or international markets where they lack direct experience, funds provide a practical entry point.

The operational burden also shifts meaningfully with fund investments. Rather than managing tenants or overseeing property managers, family office staff can focus on higher-level portfolio decisions. This reduced workload proves valuable for smaller offices where team members handle multiple responsibilities.

According to PwC’s research, family office fund investments peaked at 2,871 transactions in late 2021 before declining to 186 transactions in the first half of 2025. That drop reflects changing market conditions and a preference for more control, but funds remain a meaningful component of many family office portfolios.

Key Factors in Your Decision

Several considerations should guide your choice between direct investment and fund participation.

Staff capabilities matter most. Managing direct real estate investments requires professionals with acquisition, asset management and financial reporting expertise. Without these skills in-house, the cost of building a team may exceed the fee savings from avoiding fund managers.

Risk tolerance shapes strategy. Direct investments concentrate risk in fewer assets. A vacancy or unexpected repair in a directly owned property affects your portfolio more significantly than it would within a diversified fund. Family offices focused on wealth preservation may prefer the risk distribution funds provide.

Tax efficiency and estate planning also influence the decision. Direct ownership offers maximum control over tax strategies, including timing of sales and use of 1031 exchanges. K-1 reporting from fund investments can create complexity, particularly for family offices with holdings across multiple funds and states.

Hybrid Approaches Worth Considering

Many family offices combine elements of both strategies. They maintain direct ownership of core properties while investing in funds for exposure to specialized sectors or geographic markets.

Co-investment has become popular. Family offices invest directly alongside funds in specific deals rather than committing blind capital. This structure offers more control than traditional fund investments while leveraging a lead investor’s expertise.

Club deals represent another hybrid model. Multiple family offices pool resources to access larger transactions while sharing due diligence costs and risk. This collaborative approach enables participation in institutional-quality properties that would be too large for individual investment.

Build the Right Foundation for Family Office Real Estate Success

Regardless of which approach you choose, success in family office real estate investing requires solid financial infrastructure. Accurate accounting, timely reporting and compliance with tax requirements form the foundation for profitable portfolios. Family offices pursuing direct investments need systems to track property performance, manage cash flows and prepare K-1s for family members. Those investing through funds still need robust record-keeping to monitor fund performance and tax implications.

If your family office is evaluating real estate investment strategies or strengthening the accounting capabilities that support your portfolio, James Moore provides the expertise you need. Our professionals work closely with family offices managing real estate holdings, delivering everything from transactional accounting to tax strategy. Contact a James Moore professional to discuss how we can support your investment success.

All content provided in this article is for informational purposes only. Matters discussed in this article are subject to change. For up-to-date information on this subject please contact a James Moore professional. James Moore will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within these pages or any information accessed through this site.